Monday, 10 September 2012

So you want to study law?


Ten ways to prepare yourself for legal study

On arriving at law school students are given prodigious reading lists. Descending into the minutiae of legal study is much easier if you already have a good knowledge of all the rudiments. These are some tips for getting started.
1. Become familiar with legal language. In Gulliver’s Travels, Jonathan Swift wrote about lawyers who had “a peculiar Cant and Jargon of their own, that no other Mortal can understand”. Today, a lot of legal language is still just as esoteric. For example, misfeasance is an old term meaning the unlawful performance of a lawful act. To recuse means to refuse, as in “the judge recused himself from presiding in a case in which his brother was a litigant”. A chose in action (pronounced “shows in action”), is a legal right to procure a sum of money owed. You should get a legal dictionary. But before study in earnest you can use a good basic introductory glossary and a glossary of Latin terms.
2. Get used to thinking of law as neither entirely a “pure science” in the way that the so-called natural sciences are categorised, nor a “pure art”. The “science of law” was a tag once used by legal scholars, although much of legal study involves the use of interpretative and artful reasoning. The use of rigorous formal logic is often found in judgments but you should counterbalance that with the thought of Benjamin Jowett that logic “is neither a science nor an art, but a dodge”. This tax case featured an intriguing judicial discussion on the nature of legal study. Lord Justice Sachs said: “. . . it is plainly correct to speak of law as a science and of its study as a study of science in the same way as one speaks of the study of medicine or chemistry.”
3. Become a news buff. Law is about much more than law. It develops in relation to the world outside the library windows. Therefore, to be good at law it is very helpful to have a wide general knowledge across as many fields of life as possible. You don’t need to plough through the pages of all the specialist news but you should have a good basic knowledge of as many public debates and important developments as possible.
4. Get to know the difference between the Court of Justice of the European Communities and the European Court of Human Rights. These are often confused in public discussions and sometimes by politicians. The first one, often known as the “European Court of Justice” (ECJ) is the court of the European Union, and sits in Luxembourg. It ensures that EU law is observed. The Court hears disputes between nations and between nations and European institutions such the European Commission. A lot of the law it applies concerns commerce and trade between the EU nations and issues of employment and competition law. An individual can only bring an action if he is challenging a decision that affects him. Visit the very useful court site. The European Court of Human Rights doesn’t arise from the EU. Based in Strasbourg, it was established as a result of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and opened for business in 1959. The convention sets out a catalogue of civil and political rights and freedoms. It allows people to lodge complaints against states that have signed up to the ECHR for alleged violations of the convention. Its case law can be found in a wonderful collection.
5. Know your way around some Acts of Parliament. A large part of legal study involves familiarity with legislation, so the sooner you get immersed in the strange and wonderful world of statutes, the better. A good way to do this is to go to the official site of modern legislation, choose from the list an Act that looks interesting to you and that is also listed as having an Explanatory Note (most of the recent ones do) and then cross between reading the Note and reading the actual Act, going to and fro, in order to see how the law has been composed in order to achieve its aim. No need to sweat about remembering the contents of the Act, just get used to the sort of language used and the way Acts are structured. You might want to use a good guide to how Parliament makes law.
6. Learn the basic role of legislators, judges, solicitors and barristers. Consult the excellent official introduction to how Parliament, the source of over half of all modern law, works. Study the official guide to the judiciary, which includes everything from the different jurisdictions of different types of judge to what they wear. A good starting place to learn about the work of solicitors is from the Law Society’s site. The site also offers a useful brief history of the Law Society. The work of the barrister is very helpfully charted by the Bar Council's site.
7. Observe some law in action in the courts. Spend a day or so at your local courts and watch law being dissected, argued, judged and appealed. You should always contact the court in advance to check it will be open when you plan to go. Court addresses and details can be checked online. The Crown Court sits at about 90 venues in England and Wales. The court usually sits with a jury and hears serious criminal cases. Magistrates' courts are also interesting venues. These courts deal with about 95 per cent of criminal cases. Your local county court will also be a good place to observe civil litigation.
8. If you haven’t read them already, enjoy some classic texts often quoted by lawyers. For example, two often-cited masterpieces are:The Merchant of Venice by William Shakespeare and The Trial by Franz Kafka. The questions of justice, legal technique and jurisprudence that sparkle in The Merchant of Venice are manifold. For example, should rules ever be bent to produce justice? In a tenancy agreement case in 1976, Lord Justice Lawton declined to bend the rules in the 1968 Rent Act, concluding: “I could only do so by stretching the law. Adapting Shakespeare’s words, I might be doing a great right but I would be doing a little wrong and as Portia said: ‘Twill be recorded for a precedent, And many an error by the same example will rush into the state. It cannot be.’ I would dismiss the appeal.” The Trial is terrifying nightmare of what can happen in excessively bureaucratic regimes and totalitarian states. Kafka, who had studied law, wrote it in 1914 while he was an official in the Workmen's Accident Insurance Institute in Prague. In the book Joseph K., a bank officer, is shocked to find himself suddenly arrested for an unspecified crime and must defend himself against a charge about which he can get no information. The development of his plight is agonising, and the story is a very stimulating introduction to many aspects of legal theory and philosophy.
9. Entertain and inspire yourself by watching some classic films with a legal theme. These three are equally riveting for different reasons:
Witness for the Prosecution (1957)
A cantankerous London barrister, Sir Wilfrid Robarts, returns to his practice after suffering a heart attack and is supposed to be undertaking only civil cases of a simple kind. But he undertakes the defence of Leonard Stephen Vole in a curious murder case. His wife, the remarkable Christine Vole, is to appear as a witness: not for the defence, but for the prosecution. The film, directed by Billy Wilder, was an adaptation of the Agatha Christie play. It is a masterpiece of plot intrigue, suspense and dry wit.
Twelve Angry Men (1958)
In Manhattan's Court of General Sessions, a juror with doubts in a murder trial gradually manages to convince his fellow jurors that the case is not as clear as it appeared during the trial. An 18-year is accused of stabbing to death his father. If found guilty, he will be executed. All but three minutes of this classic 96-minute film was shot inside the spartanly furnished jury room. It is magnificently suspenseful. As one of the original film posters noted “It explodes like 12 sticks of dynamite”.
Brothers in Law (1957)
The film opens with a young man called Roger Thursby being called to the Bar. We follow him as he then takes his first steps up the legal ladder. This comedy is so fondly observed, and law has changed so little in some respects, that it is still very sharp. You meet an engaging assortment of lawyers and judges as the novitiate Thursby is hurled into cases under the eccentric Kendall Grimes, QC.
10. Become familiar with the way case decisions from the higher courts are written. This will make things much easier when begin your studies in earnest. Browse through the cases and read carefully those you find interesting. Don’t read anxiously to try to memorise the facts and legal reasoning; just find a case whose first paragraphs tell of an interesting drama or legal conundrum and then read the rest to discover what the court decided. The cases are helpfully categorised at this website so that you can select according to your preferences for criminal, civil, family, patents cases and so on.
Gary Slapper is Professor of Law, and Director of the Centre for Law at the Open University. His latest book How the Law Works is published by HarperCollins at £8.99

Thursday, 16 August 2012

Average July

Exam results are all out. What I had expected earlier did not turn out to be that good (Not something that I was expecting to get). I am bit disappointed with myself for not doing good enough to obtain good results (being Asian, good results meaning straight A's). I had this bad/evil thinking of not continuing my degree because it is not something that I meant to do but the heck. Just because i could not do well in my pre-tertiary exams, does not mean that I am not up to the standard required to continue my undergrad. But I still get to continue. Unfortunately, as for some of my friends, they could not get to move on to the next stage which is to continue their degree. :(

Some many things have happened for the past few days. Friends are running away from each hiding their faces (even though no one said anything bad about them plus there is nothing to hide from).

I am just going to continue my degree and keeping moving forward. This time, I might have to step up my pace and start working hard already. Even though it has only been few weeks in to this undergrad program, I have already start feeling the pressure in me already. The studying environment has changed. Students are expected to study on your own. Since the degree I took is an external degree program, we are expected not to be spoon fed all the time. We are required to do our own necessary research without solely depending on lecturer's class handouts and lectures.

Apart from recovering from results shock, I have had some good time watching a good movie. LOL. This movie is something not within my "taste". Well that is how I put it in. It was Step UP: Revolution. I said that it is not my taste because, I always prefer to watch something that has some legal "touch" to it. Yep.


Wednesday, 1 August 2012

Malaysia and Olympic

Have you ever wondered why Malaysia has never won anything in the world class events or games. Well, if you did, you are not alone then. Many of us use to think why our athletes perform so bad in their respective events namely football, badminton, hockey, swimming and etc. Quite often we would loathe the way these athletes compete in their games. If you had conceptualised that Malaysia's international game standard is on the decline, it is justified for you to think so, mainly due the way they perform.

But to come think of it, this is not entirely true. Such things only take place when Malaysia is competing in  large events like Olympic, Commonwealth Games or SEA. When it comes to standalone events like AFC Cup, we have had impressive games before and won them as well. To say that Malaysia is never going to regain its olden days glory is quite ridiculous. It will take some time to reach that level and a lot of effort from our fellow Malaysian athletes, to put our nation's dreams ahead of their personal agenda and try their very best to excel in the sports they embark and also to make our beloved country proud.






Wednesday, 25 July 2012

About the Blogger

A young budding law student who embarked upon soul-searching journey. He has to fight through everyday to be a world class litigant since the first day he discovered his love for law. He has explored many things in life and yet still looking forward to learn and see more.

He had fought various battle before.  Some dubbed him to be the next-chuck-norris (exaggerated) and he doesn't like to be flattered by anyone.

He had made life changing decisions Since then, he never looked back and set sail towards his new goal. 

Tuesday, 17 July 2012

EQUITY



The word ‘equity’ has a meaning of ‘fairness’; this is the basis that it operates, when adding to our law.
The development of Equity
·         The law was very technical; if there was an error in the formalities the person making the claim would lose the case.
·         The only remedy the common law courts could give was ‘damages’
The operation of Equity
1.       Equitable Remedies
a.       Mareva Injunctions
·   A court order freezing the assets of the party to an action or stopping that party moving the assets out of the country.
·   Mareva v International Bulkcarriers (1975)
·   Application will be ex parte
o   One party applies without giving notice to the other side for if the other party did not have notice
b.      Anton Piller Orders
·   An order to a defendant to allow the plaintiff on the defendant’s premises to inspect, copy or remove documents or other objects relating to the plaintiff’s property.
·   Aim: to stop def. from destroying vital evidence
·   Contempt of court
·   Ex parte application
·   Anton Piller v Manufacturing Processes Ltd (1976)
·   Orders used for
o   Breach of copyright
o   Passing off
o   Matrimonial disputes
c.       Specific performance
·   An order of a court which requires a party to perform a specific act, usually what is stated in a contract.
·   Alternative awarding damages
·   Usually used to complete a previously established transaction
·   Protecting the expectation interest of the innocent party
d.      Rectification
·   The ct. will order that, where a mistake has accidentally been made in a document so that it is not a true version of what the parties agreed, that document should be altered to reflect the parties’ intention.

2.       Equitable Maxims
a.       Equity looks to the intention and not the form               
·   Berry v Berry (1929)
·   Equity decided that as the parties had intended to alter the deed, it would be fair to look at the intention rather than the fact they got the formalities wrong.
b.      He who comes to equity must come with clean hands
·   D&C Builders Ltd v Rees (1965)
·   An equitable remedy will not be granted to a plaintiff who has not acted fairly.
c.       Delay defeats equity
·   Leaf v International Galleries (1950)
·   A plaintiff must not wait too long before making a claim as this might lead to unfairness to the other party