Saturday, 14 July 2012

ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Civil Court Structure & Alternative Dispute Resolution
·         Role of Courts?
o   Interpret and apply the law, adjudicate and settle legal dispute
o   Independent of the Executive

·         Definition of Courts?
o   Formal structure for adjudication in settling legal disputes

Individual Ct jurisdiction?

Mag. Ct
·         Wide & varied jurisdiction
·         98% criminal prosecutions
·         Extensive involvement of lay people as judges

County Ct. (less value)
·         Debt collection
·         Contract, tort and property matters
·         Limit - £25k
·         Limited jurisdiction financially and geographically areas of jurisdiction

Crown Ct.
·         More serious criminal offence (indictable and triable either way offence)
·         Judge & jury

High Ct.
·         Chancery Division-equity, trust, wills and bankruptcy
·         QBD- personal injury, contract, tort
·         More than £25k
·         Family Division – divorce, children

CoA R v James & Karimi (2006)
·         Civil Division
·         Criminal Division

Supreme Ct. (since Oct 2009)
·         Highest appellate Ct in UK

Privy Council
·         Commonwealth Ct
o   Deals mainly with doctrine of precedent from other commonwealth countries
o   Not binding in UK

European Ct.
·         ECJ
o   Applications from other member states, request for opinions on international law
·         ECtHR
o   Human rights issue against UK

General weakness of Ct
®     Costly
o   Lawyer’s fees
o   Ct fees
o   Time
o   resources
®     Delayed
®     Complex of formal procedures
®     Congestion
o   Civil cases
o   County
o   Inadequate resources
o   Inadequate employment
®     Judges
o   Not expert knowledge in all fields
o   Call for expert witness- paid by the parties themselves

General strengths of Ct
®     Impartiality / neutrality
®     Quality – analysed in depth
o   Thorough – witness being examined/ truth comes out/ cross examination
®     Effective enforcement of orders/ Finality
®     Public matter
Different modes of dispute resolution
1.       Negotiation ( Informal) – settlement is in effect some mutually acceptable resolution based on the assessed strength of the parties
2.       Adjudication (Formal) where a binding decision is given by a 3rd party (court) with a degree of authority and has power to enforce it.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
®     Helps, supplements, compliments the court structure
®     Courts over burden with workload/ caseload
®     Under resourced
®     Alternative body

a)      Arbitration
·         Work in accordance with terms set by parties
·         Impartial and expert
·         Usually used for commercial disputes, business disputes
·         Controlled by Arbitration Act


b)      Tribunals
·         Body of Non-Judges- determine dispute in a judicial manner
·         ‘Specialist’, ‘Inferior Ct’
·         Composition: 3 members
·         Controls: many ways; by the Plm- Tribunal & Enquiries Act 1992
·         High Ct: QBD via Judicial Review- can appeal on points of law
·         Council on tribunal- review & investigate complaints etc

c)       Mediation
·         Mediator facilitate, suggest solutions, do not impose orders
·         Least formal method/ most informal method
·         Voluntariness
d)      Conciliation
·         Method btwn arbitration and mediation
·         Parties encouraged to discuss their differences
·         Not formal as tribunal/ Not as informal as mediation
e)      Ombudsman
·         Investigate complaints of maladministration with regards to govt department
·         Citizens channel complaints through MP
·         Early neutral evaluation done by a lawyer and make a choice of going through a formal / informal

Strengths of ADR
®     Privacy
®     Informality/ Practical/ Flexibility
®     Speed
®     Lower cost
®     Expertise
®     Accessibility

Weaknesses of ADR
®     No publicity
®     Inconsistent procedures/ No standard rules applicable
®     Second-hand justice-quality of justice
®     Biasness- not public figures
®     Lack of enforcement- not court order- parties can disregard

No comments:

Post a Comment