DL is law made by some person or body to whom
Parliament has delegated its general law making power.
·
A validly enacted piece of delegated legislation
has the same legal force and effect as an Act of Parliament.
·
DL = subordinate law / secondary law in the form
of statutory instruments
Types of DL
1.
Orders in Council
a.
The Queen and the Privy Council have the
authority to make OiC.
b.
PC: Prime Minister and other leading members of
the Government
c.
PC has power to make law in emergency situations.
d.
OiC was used to alter the Misuse of Drugs Act
1971 so as to make a cannabis Class C drug.
i.
Five years later, Gov decide-mistake-downgrade
cannabis.
ii.
Another OiC was issued to change back to Class B
e.
Another enabling act: Constitutional Reform Act
2005
i.
Allow PC to alter the number of judges in the
Supreme Court.
2.
Statutory Instrument
a.
Refers to the rules and regulations made by
Government Ministers
b.
Approximately 3000 SIs’ are issued every year
c.
Two thirds not actively decided by Plm; become
law on a specified date
d.
Normally drafted by the legal office of the
relevant government department.
e.
Consultations of take place with interested
bodies and parties.
f.
E.G: Southern Rhodesia Act 1965
3.
Bye-laws
a.
These are means through which local authorities
and other public bodies can make legally binding rules.
b.
By-laws can also be made by public corporations
and certain companies within their jurisdiction which involve the public.
Reasons why there is
a need for/benefits of/advantages of DL
1.
Pressure upon Parliamentary time
a.
Plm does not have time to consider and debate
every small detail of complex
2.
Technicality of subject-matter
a.
Plm may not have necessary technical
expertise/knowledge required; e.g health and safety regulations,
3.
State of emergency
a.
Process of passing an Act of Plm takes a
considerable time;
b.
In emergency, Plm may not be able to pass law
quickly,
c.
DL is preferred because it can be amended or
revoked easily when necessary.
Drawbacks/ Criticism/
Disadvantages of DL
1.
Undemocratic
o
It takes law making away from democratically elected HoC
o
Allows non-elected people to make law
2.
Risk of sub-delegation
o
Law making authority is handed down to another
level
o
Comments that much of our law is made by civil
servants and merely ‘rubber stamped’ by Gov Ministers.
3.
Large volume
o
Difficult for citizens to discover what the
present law is
4.
Lack of publicity
o
Much DL is made in private contrast to public
debates of Plm
5.
Obscure wording
o
Words used in DL leads to difficulty in
understanding and to interpret the law
Control over DL
1.
By Parliament
a.
Affirmative/ negative resolutions
i.
Affirmative:
·
small number of SI will be subject to an
affirmative resolution
·
Means: the SI will not become law unless
specifically approved by Plm.
·
It cannot be amended by Plm; but can only be
approved, annulled or withdrawn
ii.
Negative
·
Most other SI subject to negative resolutions
·
Means: the relevant SI will be law unless
rejected by Plm within 40 days.
b.
Scrutiny Committee
i.
Reviews all SI and where necessary will draw
attention of both House of Parliament to point that need further consideration
ii.
Reviews are technical based
iii.
SC has no power to alter any SI
2.
By the courts
a.
Judicial review
i.
The judge will decide whether the DL is lawful
or unlawful through judicial review
b.
Doctrine of ultra vires[it goes beyond the
powers that Plm granted in the enabling act]
i.
Can be challenged in Ct. On the ground that it
is UV.
ii.
Any DL which is rule to be ultra vires is void
and not effective.
No comments:
Post a Comment